Table of Contents[Hide][Show]
How close is too close to live to cell phone towers and antennas and what to do if you discover that you are living within a distance that is impacting your health according to scientific research.
Mobile phone use continues to expand rapidly around the world. Within the next year, the number of cell phone users worldwide is projected to pass 5 billion. In the United States, well over 90% of adults now have a cell phone. The rate is nearly 50% among children as young as 10!
Not surprisingly, with so many mobile devices in use, the infrastructure to support them has grown substantially as well. Cell towers are continuing to pop up everywhere. In my small town, two new applications were filed this year alone!
If you don’t see any in your neighborhood don’t be fooled. Some cell towers are now disguised to look like trees especially if the tower is in a residential area. Disney World is famous for its tree-like cell phone infrastructure that blends almost invisibly with real foliage nearby.
The good news is that a growing number of people are now taking wise precautions to protect themselves from electromagnetic radiation (EMFs).
Avoiding fitbits, wireless baby monitors and turning off wifi at night are wise steps. Opting out of digital monitoring with your local power company to avoid the health risks from smart meters is a good idea too particularly if it is on a wall near the bedroom area.
Cell Tower Radiation
But what about cell phone towers and mobile antennas attached to existing structures? You can’t easily avoid them as they are everywhere. They are even constructed right next to schools in some cases.
Scientific Research: Living Close to a Cell Tower a Likely Cancer Risk
Many people seem to not worry about living or working in close proximity to cell towers and antennas. However, German and Israeli research to date gives cause for concern.
German Research on Cell Tower Safety
In a German study, doctors examined close to 1000 patients to see if living at the same address close to a cell tower for 10 years affected cancer risk. The social and age differences within the study group were small, with no ethnic diversity.
They discovered that the proportion of newly developed cancer cases was three times higher for those living within 1300 feet (a quarter of a mile) of a cellular transmitter compared to those living further away. In addition, they found that the patients became ill with cancer on average 8 years earlier.
A distance of 1300 feet (400m) is of particular importance. This is because computer simulation and measurements used in the study indicated that the radiation at that distance or less (the “inner area”) is 100 times greater than emissions beyond that distance (the “outer area”).
Another important observation from the research is that for the first 5 years of living near a cell phone tower, the risks were no different than someone living far away from one. However, in years 6-10, the cancer risks jumped more than threefold for those living a quarter of a mile or less from a mobile tower. Even more concerning, the average age of diagnosis was much younger. Risk for breast cancer, prostate, pancreas, bowel, melanoma, lung, and blood cancer all increased substantially.
The risks for breast cancer were most significant for those living in the inner area, with an average age of 50.8 year for a cancer diagnosis compared with nearly two decades later (70 years of age) for those in the outer area.
Israeli Mobile Phone Tower Research
Israeli research conducted by Tel Aviv University confirms a similar pattern.
In this study, 622 people living 1148 feet (350m) or less from a cell phone transmission station for 3-7 years were compared to 1222 controls living further away.
Out of the high exposure group, 8 cases of cancer were diagnosed within just one year. 3 cases of breast cancer and 1 case each of ovarian, lung, bone, kidney and lymphatic cancer.
In the control group, only 2 cases of cancer occurred even though the control group was roughly twice as large as the highly exposed group.
Based on these results, the researchers calculated the relative risk of cancer to be over four times higher for those living 350m or less (about one-fifth of a mile) from a cell phone transmitter.
Women May Be More Susceptible to Cell Tower Radiation
The Tel Aviv University research found that women appear to be more susceptible to the health effects of living near a cell tower than men.
Seven out of the eight cancers that arose during the first year were females. Thus, women living one-fifth of a mile or less from a cell tower experienced a ten fold increase in cancer risk compared with controls.
Cell Phone Tower Safety. What Should YOU Do?
If this research is concerning to you as it was to me, I would recommend that you check out antennasearch.com.
This site provides information on how many cell phone towers and mobile antennas are in your area. The exact distance of each from your home address is provided as well.
Do not rely just on your visual observation of the neighborhood. Cell towers are increasingly disguised as trees. Moreover, even if no cell towers exist, there are likely plenty of cellular antennas on existing buildings and other structures.
A typical mobile phone tower will hold 10 or more cellular antennas for various companies.
If you are planning to buy a home in the near future, consideration of cellular phone infrastructure nearby is very important. It ranks right up there with schools and other positives and negatives about the neighborhood.
I fully expect that in the future, as more research concerning the effects of EMFs on human biology emerges, real estate prices will be affected by their relative proximity to cell phone towers and/or antennas.
One word of warning. Don’t be overly concerned when you initially check your home address for nearby cellular infrastructure. The number is likely to be extremely high!
Wait until you see how close the towers and antenna are first! For example, I discovered that there are 81 towers and 124 antennas located within 4 miles of my front door! This is in a rural residential community too! However, once I looked more closely, I found that none of them is closer than a half mile away.
What to Do if You Live Too Close
If you find that you live within the inner circle of cellular towers, my suggestion is to consider moving. Though inconvenient, this is by far the best option. I’ve already had one friend change homes because of extreme sensitivity to high EMFs in her area. To date, Sweden and Germany recognize electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) as an actual medical condition. I expect that to grow in the coming years. (1, 2)
If you cannot move, then you can use curtains, paint, and wallpaper that blocks 100% of EMFs including 5G.
This is the company I’ve vetted, recommend, and buy from myself for these types of products.
Another alternative are bioenergetic devices that claim to reduce the exposure and/or risks from electromagnetic radiation. Whether they work or not is up for debate. As of this writing, I haven’t found any conclusive, randomized data to suggest they are helpful one way or another. However, if you can’t move, they are probably at least worth a shot! Perhaps in the future, they might be proven beneficial.
Another thing to be aware of is that EMF exposure has the potential to increase free radical activity in the body. Thus, living near a cell tower may decrease levels of certain protective nutrients. Thus, ensuring adequate levels of antioxidants such glutathione is a very good strategy.
Shelley Ellis
I need help please!!! I can’t anyone to help us! We have lived 285’ from a cell tower for 21 years!! I need an environmental attorney. We live in Indiana. We are looking for a new house. This house and property is our legacy to our children. I’ve been so sick for the past 21 years. Many dog deaths too! Can you help us in any way??
Sarah Pope MGA
Your best bet is to move … by the time you get any relief in the courts, it could be many years.
Lori Flynn RN
Enjoyed this article, Sarah. Are you a PA resident? We have a team in PA with a bill to be introduced shortly to ban pollution from geoengineering and cell towers/5G. Our direction comes from Zerogeoengineering.com and Zero5G.com which I welcome you to check out. The output from the present infrastructure of cell towers is toxic to all life. We have done measurements with our RF meters in quite a few locations and bring this evidence to our legislators. Our bill will limit the output from these towers as what they are emitting is far greater than what we need for good cell phone reception. I am searching for articles specifically in PA related to concerns about and actual health risks surrounding cell towers. The awareness in our state is not as high as I have found in others and my search has not been easy. I know that cancer clusters are popping up everywhere and unfortunately in schools which often have not only a nearby tower but wifi. I would like to share this article but it would be more impactful if you were a PA resident.
Sarah Pope MGA
I live in Florida.
Beverly
Dose anyone know how to stop a tower from being built in a residential area?
Sarah Pope MGA
Probably a local government petition of some sort.
Beverly Long
From my understanding NO. The companies or private landowners do not have to notify neighbors. I have a Tower that is possibly going up ( waiting) for soil sample approximately 500 yards from my home.
mary
I have the distance of the roof maybe 12 inches above my condo. have now ad cancer twice
jvb654
You can get people to read but true comprehension requires intelligence. Many people stupidly believed cigarettes were safe because they waited for the data. Isn’t that what someone above pretty much said about EMF safety? How ignorant! Whom exactly do they expect to release this data, Verizon? Apple? Using their logic, EMFs are everywhere so, therefore, they must be safe. They should read the Bioinitiative Reports. Because they all have Wi-Fi, cell phones, and use Bluetooth does not mean that everyone does. I do not. Everything I use is wired, and I test everything to ensure it’s below the safety limits – those used by other countries who actually HAVE safety limits. The US and Canada have the highest allowances in the world. I think it’s quite foolish to wait for data from companies that have literally everything to gain by not being forthright. It’s common practice in this country! Take care of the ones you love, if you won’t do it for yourself. Do your homework.
Charity Kopczeski
Is there anything we can do to prevent a cell tower from being installed near our home? Does Verizon have any obligation to check with home owners first?
Gary Mitchell
You are onto it exactly Sarah , I also think underground nuclear tests in the Pacific decreased the ozone layer.
Bocephus
I am not accepting studies unless they are peer reviewed and all variables between the test groups and control groups are accounted for.
Do you use wifi in your home or office? Do you use a microwave? Do you have smart meters on your house. Do you own a cell phone?
Ronnie
The studies are indeed correlative, not causative, they do not attempt to describe or hypothesize about a causal mechanism. They are epidemiological studies after all. A quick example using heroine with dirty needles is associated with a higher risk of HIV. But of course, using dirty needles don’t cause HIV. Getting exposed to the virus does.
The studies have merit, but they do not conclusively demonstrate that RF from cell towers are the cause. Further the p value in the Isreal study was p<0.0001 this was considered statistically significant for the study, but it's predictive power is relatively low. Ergo the increased probability of a random person next to a cell tower developing cancer vs someone not is comparatively low.
Sarah Pope MGA
Not sure what your point it? This doesn’t mean the studies are worthless! If you want to go and live 1/2 mile or less from a cell tower, you go right ahead. I’m not going to wait for a causative study to come out because by that time, I would probably already have cancer. I’ll live as far away as I can thank you!