Table of Contents[Hide][Show]
The “cow milk is for baby cows” argument against dairy does not match the reality of how humanity survived and thrived long before the advent of agriculture.
A school of thought that “cow milk is for baby cows” and that it is unnatural for humans to be drinking it has become somewhat of a catchphrase by plant-based aficionados in recent years.
In two of the radio interviews I’ve done over the years, this point was specifically addressed as a counterpoint to my discussion of the health benefits of drinking grassfed raw milk.
No doubt this notion is bolstered by the ever-increasing rates of allergies to processed dairy. Thus, more folks are wondering if dairy should be consumed by humans at all.
The vegan community also espouses this line of thinking on the principle that consumption of animal foods is fundamentally and morally wrong.
Certainly, this is a valid point to ask and the answer I have typically given is that healthy cultures consumed raw dairy for centuries.
In fact, dairy is one of humankind’s foundational foods. It supported the vibrant health and high fertility necessary to survive and thrive.
What’s more, dairy was critical to the survival of the human race long before we ended our nomadic roots and began cultivating plants.
Swiss of the Loetschental Valley
To the Traditional Swiss living in the isolated Loetschental valley, raw dairy and, in particular, butter was a sacred food.
This was not a pale supermarket butter. Rather, it was a golden alpine butter made from the rich, beige cream of cows grazing on thick grass.
The children raised on this nutrient dense, raw butter had strong physiques, wide faces with plenty of room for their teeth, and a high resistance to disease.
There wasn’t a single case of tuberculosis in Loetschental despite this illness raging elsewhere in Switzerland during the early part of the 1900s.
The young men raised on this nutrient-dense traditional diet based primarily on dairy with plenty of raw, deep yellow to orange butter were so superior in physique, strength, and character that the Vatican favored them over all others to serve in the Papal Guard.
The Maasai of Africa
During his travels in the early part of the last century, Dr. Weston Price examined five cattle-keeping groups in Africa who were still subsisting upon a completely ancestral diet.
These included:
- Maasai of Tanganyika
- Muhima of Uganda
- Chewya of Kenya
- Watusi of Ruanda
- Neurs tribes on the western side of the Nile near the country of Sudan.
These groups were largely following a carnivore diet consisting primarily of meat and milk.
These dairy-consuming peoples were very tall with even the women averaging over 6 feet in height in some tribes.
All displayed marvelous physiques and perfectly straight, uncrowded teeth. Six tribes had no dental decay whatsoever.
Clearly, the basis of milk in the diet was a critical component of the vibrant health enjoyed by these ancestral people groups.
Dairy Sustained Humans Before Agriculture!
Now, strong evidence has emerged that humans consumed dairy even before the advent of agriculture and civilization itself.
Before humans ever cultivated fruits, vegetables, and grains in prehistoric Africa, they were actively utilizing dairy cattle to sustain themselves.
While these early dairy farmers did not appear to drink fresh raw milk, they did use it to make butter, cheese, and yogurt.
Julie Dunne of the University of Bristol, the lead author of this important archaeological study, found the first direct evidence of dairy being of prime importance in the diet of the prehistoric people of the African Sahara.
These people used cattle for their milk many thousands of years ago. This was long before the cultivation of plants in this region.
Milk is one the very few foods that give us carbohydrates, fats and proteins in one go. So being able to use milk like these people did would’ve made an enormous difference to their health. It would’ve provided food for life. (1)
Archaeologists found the initial evidence in rock art images. These pictures illustrated domesticated cattle from the Wadi Imha, in the Tadrart Acacus Mountains of Libyan Sahara.
Scientists have dated these images between 5,000 and 8,000 years old.
Additional evidence came via analysis of organic residues from pottery fragments. They were excavated from the Takarkori rock shelter in Saharan Libya.
Fully half of the vessels inspected were used to process dairy products! (2)
While it seems implausible that dairy cattle could have once roamed the Sahara given its harsh and arid conditions today, Dunne notes that this region was completely different 10,000 years ago.
In fact, it was much wetter and greener than most people realize.
So the next time someone uses the “cow milk is for baby cows” line, casually mention that in the location of humanity’s earliest roots, people sustained themselves using dairy as a staple food.
This was long before humans began cultivating plants!
(1) First dairying in green Saharan Africa in the fifth millennium BC
(2) Once-Green Sahara Hosted Early African Dairy Farms
Joel Diegert via Facebook
Wow, this thread’s misinformation and conspiracy theorizing is frighteningly reminiscent of Fox News. These issues regarding vaccinations have been definitively resolved for decades.
This article addresses the whole topic, specifically the issue of the false correlation of SIDS with vaccinations (page 6)
“This American Life” did a fantastic report addressing this issue.
Here is an example in the recent news of the public health implications of not vaccinating.
Diana
Joel, you appear to have joined thehealthyhomeeconomist on Facebook today – is that simply so you can make this post? A little random if you don’t follow Sarah on a daily basis. Just my thought, but you must have a motive for that?
Also, the advice I have from those in the know is to NOT follow tiny.cc URLs as they can contain viruses. Why don’t you put the full URLs up so people know where you are directing them too?
Erica
Hi Sarah,
Since low-temp pasteurized milk is not really good, then what about pasteurized grass-fed cheese?
thehealthyhomeeconomist via Facebook
@Tijana Making kefir with it sounds like a great idea.
PriscillaC
Lol! I just read the comment made by Narrow Gate Family Farm! Guess I’m not the first one to reference that. 🙂
Priscilla
While reading my Bible yesterday, I noticed that Abraham, who lived roughly 4,000 years ago, happily served his guests a meal of butter, milk, roasted beef, and cakes made of oil and some kind of grain. Interesting!
Tijana OCeallaigh via Facebook
Okay, thanks for the info. We only use it to make kefir. For drinking and cereal I make almond milk. I don’t really know what to use for kefir, I know coconut milk will work but it’s very expensive (I get the bpa free cans you linked in one of your posts).
Leah
It’s cheaper to make coconut milk than buy it and very easy as well. http://www.crunchybetty.com/homemade-coconut-milk-the-recipe-to-remember
thehealthyhomeeconomist via Facebook
@Tijana The problem is that low temp pasteurized is just as denatured as the ultrapasteurized from what I’ve heard lately as some lab tests are being conducted comparing the two. If you choose not to drink raw milk, I would suggest not drinking any milk then as low temp pasteurized does not seem to be a good second choice as was once thought. I am planning a blog post on this when the data becomes available.
Kelli
Interesting! I knew that cows were first domesticated before agriculture rise so I figured that milk must have been in human diet for years before.
Tijana OCeallaigh via Facebook
Thank you Ann
Tijana OCeallaigh via Facebook
Hi Sarah, we don’t drink factory food, the milk we get is also from a local farm (http://www.ladylanefarm.com/), the only difference between that and the raw milk is that this one is low heat pasteurized and they have more cows (45, but that’s not the same as the hundreds of cows of CAFO’s, hormones, corn feeding, etc. etc.). Like I said, I know you can get sick from cantaloupes, strawberries, spinach and everything in between, but I can’t discount what we went through. I talked to our farmer lady after it was all over (I don’t blame her one bit for what happened by the way) and she said that she had talked to their vet afterwards and he explained that after you clean the cow’s butt, before you milk it, all it takes is a drop of water to slide down off their skin into the milking vat while you’re not looking and your whole vat is contaminated. They ended up closing their farm and selling off the animals and they don’t drink raw milk anymore either (one of their kids got sick and was in hospital for several weeks). I honor raw milk and anyone who chooses to drink it – I agree it’s a superfood and very delicious, I loved drinking it. However it does have risks. While I may choose to accept those risks for myself, I can’t make that choice for my kids.
Tawanda
So eventhough this post is about raw milk, your experience was with low-temp pasturized milk. I will look forward to the post on low-temp pasturized milk as I had assumed it would be an alternative if raw milk wasn’t available. And now we also have your experience.