Table of Contents[Hide][Show]
The “cow milk is for baby cows” argument against dairy does not match the reality of how humanity survived and thrived long before the advent of agriculture.
A school of thought that “cow milk is for baby cows” and that it is unnatural for humans to be drinking it has become somewhat of a catchphrase by plant-based aficionados in recent years.
In two of the radio interviews I’ve done over the years, this point was specifically addressed as a counterpoint to my discussion of the health benefits of drinking grassfed raw milk.
No doubt this notion is bolstered by the ever-increasing rates of allergies to processed dairy. Thus, more folks are wondering if dairy should be consumed by humans at all.
The vegan community also espouses this line of thinking on the principle that consumption of animal foods is fundamentally and morally wrong.
Certainly, this is a valid point to ask and the answer I have typically given is that healthy cultures consumed raw dairy for centuries.
In fact, dairy is one of humankind’s foundational foods. It supported the vibrant health and high fertility necessary to survive and thrive.
What’s more, dairy was critical to the survival of the human race long before we ended our nomadic roots and began cultivating plants.
Swiss of the Loetschental Valley
To the Traditional Swiss living in the isolated Loetschental valley, raw dairy and, in particular, butter was a sacred food.
This was not a pale supermarket butter. Rather, it was a golden alpine butter made from the rich, beige cream of cows grazing on thick grass.
The children raised on this nutrient dense, raw butter had strong physiques, wide faces with plenty of room for their teeth, and a high resistance to disease.
There wasn’t a single case of tuberculosis in Loetschental despite this illness raging elsewhere in Switzerland during the early part of the 1900s.
The young men raised on this nutrient-dense traditional diet based primarily on dairy with plenty of raw, deep yellow to orange butter were so superior in physique, strength, and character that the Vatican favored them over all others to serve in the Papal Guard.
The Maasai of Africa
During his travels in the early part of the last century, Dr. Weston Price examined five cattle-keeping groups in Africa who were still subsisting upon a completely ancestral diet.
These included:
- Maasai of Tanganyika
- Muhima of Uganda
- Chewya of Kenya
- Watusi of Ruanda
- Neurs tribes on the western side of the Nile near the country of Sudan.
These groups were largely following a carnivore diet consisting primarily of meat and milk.
These dairy-consuming peoples were very tall with even the women averaging over 6 feet in height in some tribes.
All displayed marvelous physiques and perfectly straight, uncrowded teeth. Six tribes had no dental decay whatsoever.
Clearly, the basis of milk in the diet was a critical component of the vibrant health enjoyed by these ancestral people groups.
Dairy Sustained Humans Before Agriculture!
Now, strong evidence has emerged that humans consumed dairy even before the advent of agriculture and civilization itself.
Before humans ever cultivated fruits, vegetables, and grains in prehistoric Africa, they were actively utilizing dairy cattle to sustain themselves.
While these early dairy farmers did not appear to drink fresh raw milk, they did use it to make butter, cheese, and yogurt.
Julie Dunne of the University of Bristol, the lead author of this important archaeological study, found the first direct evidence of dairy being of prime importance in the diet of the prehistoric people of the African Sahara.
These people used cattle for their milk many thousands of years ago. This was long before the cultivation of plants in this region.
Milk is one the very few foods that give us carbohydrates, fats and proteins in one go. So being able to use milk like these people did would’ve made an enormous difference to their health. It would’ve provided food for life. (1)
Archaeologists found the initial evidence in rock art images. These pictures illustrated domesticated cattle from the Wadi Imha, in the Tadrart Acacus Mountains of Libyan Sahara.
Scientists have dated these images between 5,000 and 8,000 years old.
Additional evidence came via analysis of organic residues from pottery fragments. They were excavated from the Takarkori rock shelter in Saharan Libya.
Fully half of the vessels inspected were used to process dairy products! (2)
While it seems implausible that dairy cattle could have once roamed the Sahara given its harsh and arid conditions today, Dunne notes that this region was completely different 10,000 years ago.
In fact, it was much wetter and greener than most people realize.
So the next time someone uses the “cow milk is for baby cows” line, casually mention that in the location of humanity’s earliest roots, people sustained themselves using dairy as a staple food.
This was long before humans began cultivating plants!
(1) First dairying in green Saharan Africa in the fifth millennium BC
(2) Once-Green Sahara Hosted Early African Dairy Farms
ELoah Christos via Facebook
everyone is lactose intolerant
Erica Brown via Facebook
I like this, we love raw milk at our house. Thanks!
Tiffany Thompson via Facebook
I enjoy all of your posts but I completely disagree with this one. These tribes did not have tooth decay because they did not eat processed foods. I believe we can consume dairy but we were not made to do so. If I needed it to survive because other food sources were lacking I would but cows milk is made for it’s calf and my milk is made for my baby. 😉
Anna Peterson Eidem via Facebook
Well said @sheril Carey.
An Organic Wife via Facebook
I found a raw source for dairy about a month ago and I’m absolutely loving it. I’ve never truly loved the taste of milk and mostly used it in baking, but raw milk is very delicious and I enjoy it on my granola every morning.
Jennifer Holdridge Black via Facebook
Guys, you are missing the point here. The argument that we, as humans, aren’t meant to drink milk is what she is talking about. There is this generalization out there, that we are not “meant to” and I think it has more to do with where you hail from….your ancestry on whether you are able to tolerate it. Also, this statistic that 60% of the population is lactose intolerant (another “evidence” given by those that believe milk is bad) is also misleading as it has to do alot with drinking pastuerized milk and not true intolerance to lactose.
Doris McDonnell via Facebook
er… sure it’s good for you, if it’s straight from the cow! the way modern people pump homogenized, pasteurized milk into their little ones, thinking it’s good for them, is really sick.
Justin Richins via Facebook
Don’t know if I agree with you on this one. I was warned about
using non pasteurized milk fresh right from the cow by our pediatrician then 4 months after drinking it my daughter became very ill from Shia-toxin Ecoli and the typing came back from the cow.
Charles Clark Peebles via Facebook
I’ve never seen a starving vegan with a chicken in the yard. Big ideals come from big conveniences. The Economist is correct, animals can graze where and when edible vegetation will not grow; plus, you gotta factor in weather, pestilence and famine – your crops will go first, grass is tougher to kill. You get hungry enough, you’ll drink that milk and it’ll do more than keep you alive, it’ll keep you strong.
Rebecca Eichenberger via Facebook
Amy Jo, dairy isn’t crucial. You are being led to believe that by a super rich industry that makes commercials to sell their product. If you can’t have dairy, you can thrive and live just as well. Leafy greens, seeds and other foods have plenty of calcium that is more easily assimilated and doesn’t cause the body to become acidic, and thus lead to bone loss. You will be well.