The insidious, little-discussed reasons why the elitist agenda for globalism promotes plant-based diets and avoiding meat, dairy and eggs to “improve your health” and “save the planet”. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Most people think that globalism is a political ideology to be duked out at the ballot box. But, the truth is that it is much more than that! It is an all-encompassing worldview so personal that it seeks to convince you how to “best” feed yourself too. And, when it comes to food philosophies, the globalists are very much in favor of a plant-based diet.
In the paragraphs below, I briefly outline why plant-based eating is being pushed so heavily from every possible digital channel we encounter on a daily basis.
We and most alarmingly, our children, are being super-saturated with plant-based diet messaging packaged as indisputably true and scientific and astroturfed online by paid social media trolls or bots to intimidate real people into mental submission.
Be very careful about how this plant-based diet craze is affecting you. The truth about this food philosophy has nothing whatsoever to do with your health and everything to do with the promotion of a control-freak globalist agenda.
Plant-Based Eating Reduces Fertility
The globalist worldview believes that humans are destroying planet Earth. While I don’t necessarily disagree with this assessment, the globalist solution to this problem is rather brutal in approach…reduce the population.
Search online for quotations from globalists like Emmanuel Macron as one of many examples. Mr. Macron has, on more than one occasion, criticized large families, particularly those from Africa.
At the Gates Foundation’s Goalkeepers Summit (aka, globalist slumber party), Macron said:
Please present me the lady who decided, being perfectly educated, to have seven, eight, nine children. (1)
Actually, I know quite a few, Mr. Macron. In fact, I am one of seven children myself, and my mother was a college graduate who enjoyed a very successful career as a school teacher before choosing to start a very large family.
Let’s examine how plant-based eating segues quite nicely with the globalist goal for the drastic reduction of female fertility rates.
You see, a plant-based diet is really veganism repackaged with more palatable (pun intended) semantics.
Nowhere do plant-based diet proselytizers reveal to would-be vegans that a plants-only diet is new in human history.
Why? For the simple reason that ancestral societies observed that such manner of eating did not successfully promote the survival of their culture.
Except for a few scattered, tiny enclaves of religious cults over the centuries, veganism as an extended lifestyle has never been done before!
No worries, because guinea pig-dom is the favored state of globalists.
More Plants, Less Libido
What we do know is that avoiding animal products in the diet will reduce libido and ultimately fertility.
No coincidence that subsisting on plants was, incidentally, the dietary prescription of the puritanical, anti-sex John Henry Kellogg, who believed humankind would be far better off with no libido for either men or women. (2, 3)
One guess what you don’t have without much libido? Right. Children!
Projections are that reducing the fertility of women to one child each would approximately halve the world population to 3.4 billion by 2075. This would be a very good thing according to the UN. (4)
By eating that plant-based diet, you are (perhaps unwittingly) supporting this very sinister global agenda. Think about that as you sit in the drive-thru burning fumes to grab an Impossible Whopper.
You’d be doing your health and the planet a lot more good grilling a real grassfed burger at home that you bought from a local pastured farm.
Plant-Based Diets Increase Female Births
Modern science is well aware that vegetarians have significantly more girls than boys.
For example, the national average in Britain is 106 boys born to every 100 girls. However, for vegetarian mothers, the ratio is drastically reversed with just 85 boys born for every 100 girls. (5)
This is significant people! Eating vegetarian, a woman reduces her chances of having a boy by nearly 20%!
A vegan diet, which excludes all animal products, not just meat, would no doubt result in even fewer boys per 100 girl births.
Why does this happen?
The likely reason is that boy fetuses are known to be less robust than female fetuses and, as such, require a higher level of maternal nutrition to remain viable.
While there’s nothing inherently problematic with more female births, throwing off the natural statistical balance between male and female births most definitely is a problem.
First of all, it indirectly will reduce fertility further as these women have fewer available partners.
Secondly, globalists like to blame men for everything, so increasing female births is a good strategy to save the planet, right?
Note what former President Barack Obama said at a December 2019 talk in Singapore.
Now women, I just want you to know; you are not perfect, but what I can say pretty indisputably is that you’re better than us [men].
I’m absolutely confident that for two years if every nation on earth was run by women, you would see a significant improvement across the board on just about everything… living standards and outcomes. (6)
I don’t agree Barry.
While more women world leaders would be awesome, having every nation on earth run by women would be just as unbalanced and undesirable as having them all run by men. All women leaders would just result in different, seemingly intractable problems, not the elimination of them.
Plant Eating Supports a Globalist Corporatocracy
Plant-based eating is synonymous with anti-family farms.
This is because a properly run, family farm essentially integrates both agriculture and livestock in a balanced, naturally biodiverse manner. Foods from these types of farms are the most nutrient-dense and healthful for humans to consume. (7)
Guess what you need for a successful family farm?
Lots of children per family…the antithesis of the globalists’ agenda.
To feed the world a plant-based diet, multi-national corporations step into the void created by a lack of family farms producing sustainable pastured meat, milk and eggs that restore the soil and the environment.
Instead, scientists synthesize our food in a lab (aka plant-based meat and milk), adding synthetic nutrients that have low to no bioavailability.
People nourished by lab-created foods are less healthy and robust than those consuming natural, nutrient-dense foods. This further supports the globalist corporatocracy by shuttling people down the cradle to grave medical path, making it nearly impossible to function without a pharmaceutical dependency of one kind or another.
It also concentrates the wealth in the hands of the few instead of the many…but that is another discussion for another day.
I’ve only touched on three reasons why the heated push for plant-based eating clearly aligns with the globalist/elitist agenda.
Just keep this in mind the next time you see an astroturfed message that plant-based diets are the healthiest way to eat. Watch out for the latest term “flexitarian” to lure more omnivores into the sticky web of false plant-based nirvana.
Do you still think this line of thinking is a stretch? Consider that the menu for the 2020 Golden Globes will be 100% plant-based to satisfy the virtue-signaling needs of all the overpaid, bubble dwelling Hollywood elitists who will attend.
The sad truth is that most people just believe whatever they are told. They will embrace a plant-based diet to the detriment of their health, which sadly, won’t begin an inevitable decline for a few years until serious issues crop up from nutritional deficiencies.
Don’t let that be you. Think for yourself, be critical and extremely skeptical of the plant-based mania. Beware of “health” books promoting a plant-based diet. They have an underlying agenda and freely distort the evidence to manipulate the public such as the baloney in Blue Zones.
Look at history. Dead people don’t earn profits or seek to manipulate and control. See what the anthropological evidence from over a dozen cultures around the world has to tell you about plant-based diet utopias.
Hint: they didn’t exist.
References
(1) Mothers of big families challenge Macron’s fertility stance
(2) 22 Reasons to Not Go Vegetarian
(3) The Surprising Reason Kellogg Invented Corn Flakes
(4) An Inconvenient Truth: Too Many People
(5) More Girl Babies for Vegetarians
(6) Women Make Better Leaders than Men
(7) Restoring Family Farms
RCA What you are reading is data presented to defend their position and has no relevance to reality. First, livestock can be (and indeed often is) raised on land not suitable for crops. In addition when using managed grazing, livestock restores crop lands. And remember, crop rotation (a practice of small farms) to protect the soil, is NOT used by big Ag.
We actual need to see atmospheric CO2 levels double from what they are currently if we really want a healthy planet. Satellites are showing us that even the current increases in CO2 are resulting in a greening of the planet.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but doesn’t having farm animals around, contribute to CO2, (which higher levels of CO2 produce bigger yielding plants) and their waste products(manure, or their excrement) turns into essential fertilizers like nitrogen for the plants to feed on? Plants intake CO2 and release oxygen as a byproduct, which makes oxygen breathing mammals and CO2 intaking plants, a symbiotic relationship. Ever heard the saying, “talk to your plants and they’ll grow bigger? The science behind that is, “people breath in oxygen, and breath out CO2 as a byproduct, whereas plants breath in CO2 and release oxygen as a byproduct”. I believe the world needs both, to keep it healthy. When I grow my greenhouse plants, I raise the CO2 levels from around 200 to 300 ppm’s(the average CO2 levels in our environment) to a constant 1500 ppm’s, which increase my overall yield up to 2 to 5 times the yield of the lowered amount of CO2 at it’s normal amount found around us in the atmosphere. I find the best fertilizer to use to feed my plants are organic fertilizers(which are mainly produced from animals) rather than chemical fertilizers. Let’s not forget what Monsanto was doing to our world and our bodies.
Maybe I’m missing the point, but isn’t having fewer children a good thing? The Earth can’t sustain us at this population level now. What’s so bad about having fewer children? It reduces the strain on resources, services, everything. YOu speak about family farms, but there’s lots of people out there who need jobs that can fill in where family can’t. (Yes I am childless at 50 by a combination of choice and chance, university educated, a meat eater.)
There is nothing wrong with fewer children if that is a person’s individual choice, but manipulating people’s food choices with propaganda to get them to eat a plant based diet believing it is healthier with the goal of reducing libido/fertility/number of baby boys born and ultimately halve the world population is morally bankrupt.
Population implosion is a huge threat to western civilization!
Did you know that there is a song out now, blaring on every radio station here, that every African man must come foreward, do the “clean” thing, and get circumcised? Circumcision reduced libido, sexual function and fertility dramatically. It also means that less men will use condoms because of the already reduced sensation. This whole campaign was sponsored by Bill Gates.
Well, your assertion that the earth can’t sustain the population is another one of the globalists lies. The myth of overpopulation has been around for centuries and has been way overblown for the last one. Soylent Green was about overpopulation in 2020, yet here we are not processing dead people into food wafers. The entire human population could fit in a space about the size of Texas, that leaves plenty of room for growing food. Take a road trip across the U.S. and see for yourself how much good clean empty space still exists. We do have overcrowding issues in population centers, however this is a planning issue, not a sustainability issue.
Thank you for this, really. I know that the Malthusan anti-populationists are targeting Africa because especially because most of the cultures there encourage farming. You’re dead on that farmers want children and especially male children. I long ago figured out that the inclusion of polysorbate 80 in vaccines is due to the desire to suppress fertility rates and that makes the Gates Foundation’s vaccine “charity” less than benevolent, and let’s not forget that Bill Gates’ father was an abortion proponent so he learned this his entire life.
Anytime I hear someone in medicine advocate for a “plant based diet” I immediately unsubscribe, protest, and make note so as to not be misled in some unrelated area. The arrogance of the globalist oligarchy is staggering.
So glad you’re paying attention for us! Love your blog 🙂
I read a number of papers by the World Resources Institute for my job and the big concern with meat eating is that raising cattle, sheep, and pigs, takes up more room per amount of food grown than does raising plant foods. And clearing rain forest for agriculture is a concern because of climate change. Also, the concern for reducing greenhouse gases in the atmosphere centers on cattle, whose gas-passing contributes a lot of methane into the air (they’re even experimenting w/ cattle and feed that produces less methane). So, the concern for climate change and the goals to reduce it per the Paris Agreement, is the main driving force behind the plant-based diet push. In some people’s minds, the reduction of CO2 is a form of “terraforming” that is aimed at supporting nonhuman lifeforms in the future. Humans are blamed for climate change even though scientists know that the sun is at the center of changing climate because the climates on other planets in our system are also changing, and there ain’t no cows (or humans) there!
These kinds of papers are an over-simplification (and it doesn’t necessarily sound like you believe what you’re reading…). Much of the oft-quoted and prominent literature on agriculture and climate change and the ‘world-saving’ advantages of plant-based eating use the smoke and mirrors effect of averaging of statistics, and do not consider variations in geographic realities. There is a failure to acknowledge that large tracts of land in semi-arid zones around the world lack the fertility for growing plant food crops, but are very sensible for pastured animals. Most people are totally ignorant of agriculture and presume one bit of ground is much like another, and simplistic vegan arguments urge us to turn it all over to plant crops, when the soil will just not grow crops. Also, much sustainable agriculture works due to synergies between keeping livestock and crop growing. The vegan agenda would have that those animals are keep merely for the purposes of their weed eating capacities and poop – a very inefficient use of increasingly limited agricultural land, as, ironically, urban-based developments (and vast majority of vegans are urban dwellers) cover over more and more fertile crop-growing farmlands… It’s also easier to blame agriculture than to look, for example, at some startling things like the fact that greenhouse gas emissions from maintaining enormous data banks to contain explosion of ‘cloud computing’ is fast approaching 15% of total emissions! Not to mention airplane travel… and many other things that are apparently more necessary than eating meat…
wow, I never connected the dots with globalism and vegans! I know I dont like anything about globalism now I have 1 more thing I dont like about it! mostly I love that you had the courage to write about it! This is something some controling people in America dont want us to speak about. I’m thankful for you! I will encourage friends to read your blog!
Thanks for bringing this topic to the forefront, There is a YouTube channel that speaks about the synthetic biology foods flooding the market. She has really done here research and I believe your readers will find the videos on her channel informative and interesting. Please Stop The Ride to a Biotech Food Takeover.
Is there a difference between a plant-based diet and a plant-strong diet? Seems even WAP and integrative/functional practitioners suggest a plate with a small portion of meat alongside a large portion of vegetables, leafy greens getting emphasis. Guess I haven’t thought of “plant-based” as strictly excluding meat or animal products.
That’s a good point. From my perspective, I think there is a difference … plants are certainly fine and most definitely necessary for health. Plants keep us clean internally and animal foods are most nourishing which is how Dr. Natasha Campbell-McBride likes to put it. It seems to me that the plant-based messaging is all about eliminating animal foods (ideally completely according to the globalists) as much as possible from the diet.
Fantastic article Sarah, thank you! I laughed and agreed through the entire thing.
This is the real threat that most ignore!
42 million babies killed by abortion in 2019
A heartbreaking reminder about the prevalence of abortion, as statistics compiled by Worldometers indicate that there were over 42.3 million abortions world-wide in 2019, reports Life News.
By contrast, 8.2 million people died from cancer in 2019, 5 million from smoking, 13 million from disease, and 1.7 million died of HIV/AIDS.
Hmmm, sounds like a stretch on reasoning. But, ok.
Btw, I’m a prudent omnivore, and, btw, I find starch foods aren’t so good for my body integrity, though I realize the benefits of starches in creating large populations, due to the ease, abundance, cheapness, and storeability of growing starch foods. Although beer is a great food for me. Starches gunk the lymp and body, which leads to the common cold and diseases,… due to gunking up of the body. Though as to how well someone handles starches is variable per person, and generally the younger one is the better starches are handled by the body. And, I realize, often starches are all that people can afford which provides adequate sustenance.
Great article except that more women equals more children…one of the reasons that primitive societies kept women from fighting wars. Only takes one man to fertilize dozens of women. Now I am fairly certain that this fact does not harm your main point at all. Just because they can have more children doesn’t mean they WILL have more children. The other item that the globalists have made popular is NOT having children and playing the field. That is working a charm so far.
The research indicates that women without partners tend to most frequently have just one biological child (if they have any at all)…exactly the number that globalists are shooting for. What you are referring to is a polygamous situation from centuries past, which is illegal in most of the world and not likely something that is going to make a comeback as a popular lifestyle anytime soon.
Hi Sarah, good article, it worries me to think that in the future this people will ban all animal food and make us, by force, eat only plants, you know something like the vaccines issues, this is a real problem, that will affect our children, anyway thank you for writing about this
I think the globalists will eventually start pushing for a tax on animal foods…kind of like the tax on mega drinks that nanny mayor Bloomberg put in place in NYC a few years ago.
Just another reason to have a few backyard hens and other local methods for obtaining nutrient dense foods that are outside of the Big Food production/distribution channels.