The stories became far too frequent to ignore. Emails from folks with allergic or digestive issues to wheat in the United States experienced no symptoms whatsoever when they tried eating pasta on vacation in Italy.
Confused parents wondering why wheat consumption sometimes triggered autoimmune reactions in their children but not at other times.
In my own home, I’ve long pondered why my husband can eat the wheat I prepare at home, but he experiences negative digestive effects eating even a single roll in a restaurant.
There is clearly something going on with wheat that is not well known by the general public. It goes far and beyond organic versus nonorganic, gluten or hybridization because even conventional wheat triggers no symptoms for some who eat wheat in other parts of the world.
What indeed is going on with wheat?
For quite some time, I secretly harbored the notion that wheat in the United States must, in fact, be genetically modified. GMO wheat secretly invading the North American food supply seemed the only thing that made sense and could account for the varied experiences I was hearing about.
I reasoned that it couldn’t be the gluten or wheat hybridization. Gluten and wheat hybrids have been consumed for thousands of years. It just didn’t make sense that this could be the reason for so many people suddenly having problems with wheat and gluten in general in the past 5-10 years.
Finally, the answer came over dinner a couple of months ago with a friend who was well versed in the wheat production process. I started researching the issue for myself, and was, quite frankly, horrified at what I discovered.
The good news is that the reason wheat has become so toxic in the United States is not that it is secretly GMO as I had feared (thank goodness!).
The bad news is that the problem lies with the manner in which wheat is grown and harvested by conventional wheat farmers.
You’re going to want to sit down for this one. I’ve had some folks burst into tears in horror when I passed along this information before.
Common wheat harvest protocol in the United States is to drench the wheat fields with Roundup several days before the combine harvesters work through the fields as the practice allows for an earlier, easier and bigger harvest.
Pre-harvest application of the herbicide Roundup or other herbicides containing the deadly active ingredient glyphosate to wheat and barley as a desiccant was suggested as early as 1980. It has since become routine over the past 15 years and is used as a drying agent 7-10 days before harvest within the conventional farming community.
According to Dr. Stephanie Seneff of MIT who has studied the issue in-depth and who I recently saw present on the subject at a nutritional conference in Indianapolis, desiccating non-organic wheat crops with glyphosate just before harvest came into vogue late in the 1990s with the result that most of the non-organic wheat in the United States is now contaminated with it. Seneff explains that when you expose wheat to a toxic chemical like glyphosate, it actually releases more seeds resulting in a slightly greater yield: “It ‘goes to seed’ as it dies. At its last gasp, it releases the seed” says Dr. Seneff.
According to the US Department of Agriculture, as of 2012, 99% of durum wheat, 97% of spring wheat, and 61% of winter wheat have been treated with herbicides. This is an increase from 88% for durum wheat, 91% for spring wheat and 47% for winter wheat since 1998. Note that bulgur is commonly made from durum.
Here’s what wheat farmer Keith Lewis has to say about the practice:
I have been a wheat farmer for 50 yrs and one wheat production practice that is very common is applying the herbicide Roundup (glyposate) just prior to harvest. Roundup is licensed for preharvest weed control. Monsanto, the manufacturer of Roundup claims that application to plants at over 30% kernel moisture result in roundup uptake by the plant into the kernels. Farmers like this practice because Roundup kills the wheat plant allowing an earlier harvest.
A wheat field often ripens unevenly, thus applying Roundup preharvest evens up the greener parts of the field with the more mature. The result is on the less mature areas Roundup is translocated into the kernels and eventually harvested as such.
This practice is not licensed. Farmers mistakenly call it “desiccation.” Consumers eating products made from wheat flour are undoubtedly consuming minute amounts of Roundup. An interesting aside, malt barley which is made into beer is not acceptable in the marketplace if it has been sprayed with preharvest Roundup. Lentils and peas are not accepted in the market place if it was sprayed with preharvest roundup….. but wheat is ok.. This farming practice greatly concerns me and it should further concern consumers of wheat products.
Here’s what wheat farmer Seth Woodland of Woodland and Wheat in Idaho had to say about the practice of using herbicides for wheat dry down:
That practice is bad . I have fellow farmers around me that do it and it is sad. Lucky for you not all of us farm that way. Being the farmer and also the president of a business, we are proud to say that we do not use round up on our wheat ever!
This practice is not just widespread in the United States either. The Food Standards Agency in the United Kingdom reports that the use of Roundup as a wheat desiccant results in glyphosate residues regularly showing up in bread samples. Other European countries are waking up to the danger, however. In the Netherlands, the use of Roundup is completely banned with France likely soon to follow.
Using Roundup on wheat crops throughout the entire growing season and even as a desiccant just prior to harvest may save the farmer money and increase profits, but it is devastating to the health of the consumer who ultimately consumes the glyphosate residue laden wheat kernels.
The chart below of skyrocketing applications of glyphosate to US wheat crops since 1990 and the incidence of celiac disease is from a December 2013 study published in the Journal Interdisciplinary Toxicology examining glyphosate pathways to autoimmune disease. Remember that wheat is not currently GMO or “Roundup Ready” meaning it is not resistant to its withering effects like GMO corn or GMO soy, so the application of glyphosate to wheat would actually kill it.
While the herbicide industry maintains that glyphosate is minimally toxic to humans, research published in the Journal Entropy strongly argues otherwise by shedding light on exactly how glyphosate disrupts mammalian physiology.
Authored by Anthony Samsel and Stephanie Seneff of MIT, the paper investigates glyphosate’s inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, an overlooked component of lethal toxicity to mammals.
The currently accepted view is that ghyphosate is not harmful to humans or any mammals. This flawed view is so pervasive in the conventional farming community that Roundup salesmen have been known to foolishly drink it during presentations!
However, just because Roundup doesn’t kill you immediately doesn’t make it nontoxic. In fact, the active ingredient in Roundup lethally disrupts the all important shikimate pathway found in beneficial gut microbes which is responsible for the synthesis of critical amino acids.
Friendly gut bacteria, also called probiotics, play a critical role in human health. Gut bacteria aid digestion, prevent permeability of the gastrointestinal tract (which discourages the development of autoimmune disease), synthesize vitamins and provide the foundation for robust immunity. In essence:
Roundup significantly disrupts the functioning of beneficial bacteria in the gut and contributes to permeability of the intestinal wall and consequent expression of autoimmune disease symptoms.
In synergy with disruption of the biosynthesis of important amino acids via the shikimate pathway, glyphosate inhibits the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes produced by the gut microbiome. CYP enzymes are critical to human biology because they detoxify the multitude of foreign chemical compounds, xenobiotics, that we are exposed to in our modern environment today.
As a result, humans exposed to glyphosate through the use of Roundup in their community or through the ingestion of its residues on industrialized food products become even more vulnerable to the damaging effects of other chemicals and environmental toxins they encounter!
What’s worse is that the negative impact of glyphosate exposure is slow and insidious over months and years as inflammation gradually gains a foothold in the cellular systems of the body.
The consequences of this systemic inflammation are most of the diseases and conditions associated with the Western lifestyle:
- Gastrointestinal disorders
- Obesity
- Diabetes
- Heart Disease
- Depression
- Autism
- Infertility
- Cancer
- Multiple Sclerosis
- Alzheimer’s disease
- And the list goes on and on and on …
In a nutshell, Dr. Seneff’s study of Roundup’s ghastly glyphosate, which much of the wheat crop in the United States is doused with annually, uncovers the manner in which this lethal toxin harms the human body by decimating beneficial gut microbes with the tragic end result of disease, degeneration, and widespread suffering.
Got the picture yet?
Even if you think you have no trouble digesting wheat, it is still very wise to avoid conventional wheat as much as possible in your diet!
You Must Avoid Toxic Wheat No Matter What
The bottom line is that avoidance of conventional wheat in the United States is absolutely imperative even if you don’t currently have a gluten allergy or wheat sensitivity. This includes bypassing food products made with it such as the popular meat substitute seitan also called vital wheat gluten. The increase in the amount of glyphosate applied to wheat closely correlates with the rise of celiac disease and gluten intolerance. Dr. Seneff points out that the increases in these diseases are not just genetic in nature, but also have an environmental cause as not all patient symptoms are alleviated by eliminating gluten from the diet.
The effects of deadly glyphosate on your biology are so insidious that lack of symptoms today means literally nothing.
If you don’t have problems with wheat now, you will in the future if you keep eating conventionally produced, toxic wheat!
How to Eat Wheat Safely
Obviously, if you’ve already developed a sensitivity or allergy to wheat, you must avoid it. Period.
But, if you aren’t celiac or gluten sensitive and would like to consume this ancestral food safely, you can do what we do in our home. We source organic, naturally low in gluten, unhybridized Einkorn wheat for breadmaking, pancakes, cookies, etc. Please note that einkorn is not to be confused with the more general term farro, which includes emmer and spelt, which are both hybridized. You can learn more about the scientific research on the “good” gluten in einkorn in this article.
When we eat out or are purchasing food from the store, conventional wheat products are rejected without exception. This despite the fact that we have no gluten allergies whatsoever in our home – yet.
I am firmly convinced that if we did nothing, our entire family at some point would develop sensitivity to wheat or autoimmune disease in some form due to the toxic manner in which it is processed and the glyphosate residues that are contained in conventional wheat products.
What Are You Going to Do About Toxic Wheat?
How did you react to the news that US wheat farmers are using Roundup, not just to kill weeds, but to dry out the wheat plants to allow for an earlier, easier and bigger harvest and that such a practice causes absorption of toxic glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup and other herbicides, right into the wheat kernels themselves?
Did you feel outraged and violated as I did? How will you implement a conventional wheat-avoidance strategy going forward even if you haven’t yet developed a problem with gluten or wheat sensitivity?
What about other crops where Roundup is used as a pre-harvest desiccant such as barley, sugar cane, rice, seeds, dried beans and peas, sugar cane, sweet potatoes, and sugar beets? Will you only be buying these crops in organic form from now on to avoid this modern, man-made scourge?
UPDATE: The Soil Association in July 2015 called for an immediate ban on the use of glyphosate for wheat ripening and desiccation purposes. The nonprofit reports that glyphosate residues are widely found in nonorganic wheat samples and the use of the herbicide on wheat crops has increased 400% in the past two decades.
Dr. Robin Mesnage of the Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics at Kings College in London, revealed new data analysis showing Roundup, the most common brand of Glyphosate based herbicides, is 1,000 times more toxic than genotoxic glyphosate alone due to the inclusion of other toxic chemicals in its mix.
Peter Melchett, Soil Association policy director said; “If Glyphosate ends up in bread it’s impossible for people to avoid it unless they are eating organic. On the other hand, farmers could easily choose not to use Glyphosate as a spray on wheat crops – just before they are harvested. This is why the Soil Association is calling for the immediate ending of the use of Glyphosate sprays on wheat destined for use in bread.”
References
Glyphosate now commonly found in human urine
Study: Glyphosate, Celiac and Gluten Intolerance
The Glyphosate, Celiac Disease Connection
Pre-harvest Application of Glyphosate to Wheat
Glyphosate’s Suppression of Cytochrome P450 Enzymes and Amino Acid Biosynthesis by the Gut Microbiome: Pathways to Modern Diseases
Yield and quality of wheat seeds as a function of desiccation stages and herbicides
Wheat farmer weighs in on the use of Roundup as a wheat desiccant
More Information
Roundup: Quick Death for Weeds, Slow and Painful Death for You
Hybrid Wheat is Not the Same as GMO Wheat
The Dutch Ban Roundup, France and Brazil to Follow
How to Mix and Use Gluten Free Flour
Can Celiacs Eat Sourdough Bread?
The Dirty Little Secret About Gluten-Free
Buford
What if the Roundup is organic?
Sarah TheHealthyHomeEconomist
Toxic chemicals can never be considered organic or used on organic crops.
Gretchen
Sarah,
Do you consider BT to be toxic? You know… the gene inserted into corn to produce toxins to kill bugs.
Rod
Why did organic growers fight to leave chlorine bleach available to be used as a wash on lettuce? Because they knew the public would as fast as they can from ecoli on their produce.
Br.Bill
That simply is not true. All kinds of toxic chemicals are considered organic. Nicotine sulfate, for one.
rod
Nitrogen is organic too, no one want to admit it however. Comes right out of the air.
anon
How about the chemicals that cause autotoxicity in alfalfa? Or those that cause the allelopathy in walnut trees? What about BT (not in the form of GMO corn but just as the bacteria itself)? What about pokeweed, or mayapples? They all naturally produce “toxic chemicals”.
Chris
http://chriskresser.com/9-steps-to-perfect-health-1-dont-eat-toxins
Aubergine
This is a very interesting article and a theory which may come to be proven in years to come. The effects of Roundup residues in our food are no doubt detrimental, given that Roundup kills microbes and chelates minerals out of the body. It’s alarming that the EPA recently raised the allowable residue limit on Roundup on in our foods. We grow older varieties of heritage wheat and rye organically on our farm (as well as Einkorn and Emmer though we currently have no way to hull these 2 grains) which we mill into flour ourselves and we feel it is a healthy product. Wheat as a whole grain, grown organically, should not be shunned unless you have trouble digesting gluten. However, whole grain flours in general have a tendency to go rancid more quickly than white flour, and it’s important to always consume flour that is freshly milled. There are many great sources of organic wheat out there and most people can digest gluten well, if consumed in moderation.
Sarah TheHealthyHomeEconomist
I agree .. demonizing wheat is not the answer. It’s not a black and white issue. It’s about educating people that the wheat they are eating is by and large toxic and how to source and prepare wheat that can be enjoyed and consumed safely.
Carolyn Luckhurst
I am reading all these posts with interest because I have recently removed gluten from my diet to try to eliminate issues that I’ve had with processing food through my body. I noticed an almost immediate improvement. Feeling very much better, I have been surprised by a couple of occasions when I know I’ve not eaten anything with gluten but have still had a bad reaction. So, could it have been Round Up on sweet potatoes? Now I am not so sure it’s the gluten that’s causing the problem. Buying organic foods seems to be worth a try and go through a careful process of elimination.
Stan Pace
Sarah, I left employment as an ag agent with extension years ago because I got tired of telling people how to kill things. I began to study calcium through the works of a brilliant mathematician and scientist, Carey Reams. Calcium is the trucker of nutrients in the plant, therefore as it is tied up by the glyphosate it can’t deliver the other nutrients, rendering many nutrient deficiencies. As you mention in your article it (calcium) is also very important with regard to probiotics. In the soil a healthy bacteria population is the key to the digestion of organic matter and crop residues which provide our next year crop with predigested plant foods. At the foundational level (the soil) available calcium and balanced soils are the answer, but that, I am not sure will ever be taught. Many ag consultants view calcium and lime as the same thing, when they are not. Lime I use to increase my total calcium or to increase the ph which reduces losses of fertilization efficiency. Available calcium come only through the release of the calcium that is in the soil through my efforts or natural limestone. Today’s fertilization regiment is focused on N-P-K and it does grow crops in volume. It will never increase the quality though because it can never be a balanced program that feeds the cycle of life that starts in the soil.
watchmom3
Stan, thank you so much for your comment! We are farmers/ranchers and our kids grew up in 4-H, so we have a special place in our hearts for Ag/Ext. agents! Anyway, my daughter thought she wanted to be one, and after some debate, has found that the ag programs of the big universities are really pushing propaganda about gmos/pesticides/non organic value…etc…anyway, it makes us sad that the old ways are not valued anymore in this nation, except by those who are not afraid to challenge an idea to see if it is truly valid. Our ext agent has voiced his frustration about some of the things he was asked to do/say/push that he found less than truthful.. Thanks for being willing to live what you believe…it is hard sometimes. God bless from west Texas!
AreaMan
Same thing with the “state/county farm bureaus,” at least in my area in IL. Chemicals, agribiz, and trying to put a friendly face on GMO. Why do they even get to use the name “state farm bureau” or “county farm bureau” anyway? They are private organizations.
Julie Mylander
There are some definitive holes in the theory presented here. I grew up on a very large wheat farm in Utah and Idaho.n I have had Celiac disease my entire life (way before there was ever a thought of something called “Round Up”). My Celiac was not diagnosed until I was 50 years old. Why? Because of lots of reasons; one of which is that the tests to definitely determine the autoimmune disease of Celiac being present have only been in existence since the late 80’s-early 90’s. The gold standard of testing is an actual endoscopy of the small intestine.
I grew up on organically grown, home milled, home made, whole wheat bread. And yet, I still have Celiac disease and have suffered with the symptoms my entire life until going completely GLUTEN free. Gluten is a protein found in wheat, barley, malt, rye and other grains.
I suggest reading the book “Celiac Disease, A Hidden Epidemic” by Dr. Peter H.R. Green.
Sarah TheHealthyHomeEconomist
This article never claims that the only reason for celiac disease is roundup sprayed on wheat crops. Celiac disease has indeed been around for a long time (genetic) but why the sudden huge spike in the last 10 years or so? Something environmental for sure as it impossible to have a genetic epidemic.
Debby Jacobson
Where can we buy your wheat or other heritage wheat?
Andrea
Obesity is not a disease! Cut it the hell out with the fatphobia!
Otherwise it would have been a great article. Health At Every Size, mate.
AP
Obesity does, indeed, meet the definition of a disease. It decreases life expectancy and impairs the normal functioning of the body, and it can be caused by genetic factors. Last year, the American Medical Association classified it officially as a disease:
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/262226.php
MelT
Bee Colony Collapse and White Nose Bat Syndrome are all caused by the same thing that is killing us. Infections caused by using fecal infected wastes for fertilizers knowing in 1981 there was NO way to kill spirochetal prion proteins they gave us for decades. It got worse when the junk gene GMO started recombining as well. It’s why the millions of Autism kids suffering stealth infections cannot tolerate junk gene GMO grain.
http://www.lymeneteurope.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=4840&p=36246#p36246
It’s also what is killing the Reptiles and Amphibians after giving them to us for decades….
When you look at the millions suffering all manner of neurological syndromes, psych, and cancers they all have a treatable cause they refused to stop.
Denarah
Is this also done with non-organic peanuts to increase production? Does it also explain the increase in peanut allergies?
Jennie
Actually, conventional peanut crops are rotated with cotton….which is GMO and heavily sprayed with round up.
j nels
Rice is a rotational crop with cotton. Arsenic is used on cotton to kill the proverbial cotton weevil. So that is why rice is now known to contain fair amounts of arsenic to the point that recommended rice consumption for children has been lowered much as they have with fish in the Columbia River. California rice has a lower level of arsenic as it is not a rotational crop to cotton most of the time.
Living in an apple and fruit valley of Oregon, one of our first organic orchardists once jestingly
remarked, “If the govt. knew how much arsenic is in my soil the govt. would make me put a fence around it.” Why? During the ’40’s orchardists found if they sprayed overhead arsenic drench that they would get spotless fruit. Suurrree!.
Jaime
Thank You for a very informative and well written article. I was unaware of the prevalence of this practice. Sad to say that it does not surprise me. However, by sharing information like this I believe that we will be able to turn the tide against these practices that are essentially so anti-life. Keep up the good work–truly.
J
daveinozz
Can anybody advise me if this practice done down here in ozz, I do know that experimental plantating of GMO wheat was given the go ahead a couple or so years ago but weather it actually happened or not, well I’m not sure because of a bit of an uproar from the serfs
thanks in advance