The stories became far too frequent to ignore. Emails from folks with allergic or digestive issues to wheat in the United States experienced no symptoms whatsoever when they tried eating pasta on vacation in Italy.
Confused parents wondering why wheat consumption sometimes triggered autoimmune reactions in their children but not at other times.
In my own home, I’ve long pondered why my husband can eat the wheat I prepare at home, but he experiences negative digestive effects eating even a single roll in a restaurant.
There is clearly something going on with wheat that is not well known by the general public. It goes far and beyond organic versus nonorganic, gluten or hybridization because even conventional wheat triggers no symptoms for some who eat wheat in other parts of the world.
What indeed is going on with wheat?
For quite some time, I secretly harbored the notion that wheat in the United States must, in fact, be genetically modified. GMO wheat secretly invading the North American food supply seemed the only thing that made sense and could account for the varied experiences I was hearing about.
I reasoned that it couldn’t be the gluten or wheat hybridization. Gluten and wheat hybrids have been consumed for thousands of years. It just didn’t make sense that this could be the reason for so many people suddenly having problems with wheat and gluten in general in the past 5-10 years.
Finally, the answer came over dinner a couple of months ago with a friend who was well versed in the wheat production process. I started researching the issue for myself, and was, quite frankly, horrified at what I discovered.
The good news is that the reason wheat has become so toxic in the United States is not that it is secretly GMO as I had feared (thank goodness!).
The bad news is that the problem lies with the manner in which wheat is grown and harvested by conventional wheat farmers.
You’re going to want to sit down for this one. I’ve had some folks burst into tears in horror when I passed along this information before.
Common wheat harvest protocol in the United States is to drench the wheat fields with Roundup several days before the combine harvesters work through the fields as the practice allows for an earlier, easier and bigger harvest.
Pre-harvest application of the herbicide Roundup or other herbicides containing the deadly active ingredient glyphosate to wheat and barley as a desiccant was suggested as early as 1980. It has since become routine over the past 15 years and is used as a drying agent 7-10 days before harvest within the conventional farming community.
According to Dr. Stephanie Seneff of MIT who has studied the issue in-depth and who I recently saw present on the subject at a nutritional conference in Indianapolis, desiccating non-organic wheat crops with glyphosate just before harvest came into vogue late in the 1990s with the result that most of the non-organic wheat in the United States is now contaminated with it. Seneff explains that when you expose wheat to a toxic chemical like glyphosate, it actually releases more seeds resulting in a slightly greater yield: “It ‘goes to seed’ as it dies. At its last gasp, it releases the seed” says Dr. Seneff.
According to the US Department of Agriculture, as of 2012, 99% of durum wheat, 97% of spring wheat, and 61% of winter wheat have been treated with herbicides. This is an increase from 88% for durum wheat, 91% for spring wheat and 47% for winter wheat since 1998. Note that bulgur is commonly made from durum.
Here’s what wheat farmer Keith Lewis has to say about the practice:
I have been a wheat farmer for 50 yrs and one wheat production practice that is very common is applying the herbicide Roundup (glyposate) just prior to harvest. Roundup is licensed for preharvest weed control. Monsanto, the manufacturer of Roundup claims that application to plants at over 30% kernel moisture result in roundup uptake by the plant into the kernels. Farmers like this practice because Roundup kills the wheat plant allowing an earlier harvest.
A wheat field often ripens unevenly, thus applying Roundup preharvest evens up the greener parts of the field with the more mature. The result is on the less mature areas Roundup is translocated into the kernels and eventually harvested as such.
This practice is not licensed. Farmers mistakenly call it “desiccation.” Consumers eating products made from wheat flour are undoubtedly consuming minute amounts of Roundup. An interesting aside, malt barley which is made into beer is not acceptable in the marketplace if it has been sprayed with preharvest Roundup. Lentils and peas are not accepted in the market place if it was sprayed with preharvest roundup….. but wheat is ok.. This farming practice greatly concerns me and it should further concern consumers of wheat products.
Here’s what wheat farmer Seth Woodland of Woodland and Wheat in Idaho had to say about the practice of using herbicides for wheat dry down:
That practice is bad . I have fellow farmers around me that do it and it is sad. Lucky for you not all of us farm that way. Being the farmer and also the president of a business, we are proud to say that we do not use round up on our wheat ever!
This practice is not just widespread in the United States either. The Food Standards Agency in the United Kingdom reports that the use of Roundup as a wheat desiccant results in glyphosate residues regularly showing up in bread samples. Other European countries are waking up to the danger, however. In the Netherlands, the use of Roundup is completely banned with France likely soon to follow.
Using Roundup on wheat crops throughout the entire growing season and even as a desiccant just prior to harvest may save the farmer money and increase profits, but it is devastating to the health of the consumer who ultimately consumes the glyphosate residue laden wheat kernels.
The chart below of skyrocketing applications of glyphosate to US wheat crops since 1990 and the incidence of celiac disease is from a December 2013 study published in the Journal Interdisciplinary Toxicology examining glyphosate pathways to autoimmune disease. Remember that wheat is not currently GMO or “Roundup Ready” meaning it is not resistant to its withering effects like GMO corn or GMO soy, so the application of glyphosate to wheat would actually kill it.
While the herbicide industry maintains that glyphosate is minimally toxic to humans, research published in the Journal Entropy strongly argues otherwise by shedding light on exactly how glyphosate disrupts mammalian physiology.
Authored by Anthony Samsel and Stephanie Seneff of MIT, the paper investigates glyphosate’s inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes, an overlooked component of lethal toxicity to mammals.
The currently accepted view is that ghyphosate is not harmful to humans or any mammals. This flawed view is so pervasive in the conventional farming community that Roundup salesmen have been known to foolishly drink it during presentations!
However, just because Roundup doesn’t kill you immediately doesn’t make it nontoxic. In fact, the active ingredient in Roundup lethally disrupts the all important shikimate pathway found in beneficial gut microbes which is responsible for the synthesis of critical amino acids.
Friendly gut bacteria, also called probiotics, play a critical role in human health. Gut bacteria aid digestion, prevent permeability of the gastrointestinal tract (which discourages the development of autoimmune disease), synthesize vitamins and provide the foundation for robust immunity. In essence:
Roundup significantly disrupts the functioning of beneficial bacteria in the gut and contributes to permeability of the intestinal wall and consequent expression of autoimmune disease symptoms.
In synergy with disruption of the biosynthesis of important amino acids via the shikimate pathway, glyphosate inhibits the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes produced by the gut microbiome. CYP enzymes are critical to human biology because they detoxify the multitude of foreign chemical compounds, xenobiotics, that we are exposed to in our modern environment today.
As a result, humans exposed to glyphosate through the use of Roundup in their community or through the ingestion of its residues on industrialized food products become even more vulnerable to the damaging effects of other chemicals and environmental toxins they encounter!
What’s worse is that the negative impact of glyphosate exposure is slow and insidious over months and years as inflammation gradually gains a foothold in the cellular systems of the body.
The consequences of this systemic inflammation are most of the diseases and conditions associated with the Western lifestyle:
- Gastrointestinal disorders
- Obesity
- Diabetes
- Heart Disease
- Depression
- Autism
- Infertility
- Cancer
- Multiple Sclerosis
- Alzheimer’s disease
- And the list goes on and on and on …
In a nutshell, Dr. Seneff’s study of Roundup’s ghastly glyphosate, which much of the wheat crop in the United States is doused with annually, uncovers the manner in which this lethal toxin harms the human body by decimating beneficial gut microbes with the tragic end result of disease, degeneration, and widespread suffering.
Got the picture yet?
Even if you think you have no trouble digesting wheat, it is still very wise to avoid conventional wheat as much as possible in your diet!
You Must Avoid Toxic Wheat No Matter What
The bottom line is that avoidance of conventional wheat in the United States is absolutely imperative even if you don’t currently have a gluten allergy or wheat sensitivity. This includes bypassing food products made with it such as the popular meat substitute seitan also called vital wheat gluten. The increase in the amount of glyphosate applied to wheat closely correlates with the rise of celiac disease and gluten intolerance. Dr. Seneff points out that the increases in these diseases are not just genetic in nature, but also have an environmental cause as not all patient symptoms are alleviated by eliminating gluten from the diet.
The effects of deadly glyphosate on your biology are so insidious that lack of symptoms today means literally nothing.
If you don’t have problems with wheat now, you will in the future if you keep eating conventionally produced, toxic wheat!
How to Eat Wheat Safely
Obviously, if you’ve already developed a sensitivity or allergy to wheat, you must avoid it. Period.
But, if you aren’t celiac or gluten sensitive and would like to consume this ancestral food safely, you can do what we do in our home. We source organic, naturally low in gluten, unhybridized Einkorn wheat for breadmaking, pancakes, cookies, etc. Please note that einkorn is not to be confused with the more general term farro, which includes emmer and spelt, which are both hybridized. You can learn more about the scientific research on the “good” gluten in einkorn in this article.
When we eat out or are purchasing food from the store, conventional wheat products are rejected without exception. This despite the fact that we have no gluten allergies whatsoever in our home – yet.
I am firmly convinced that if we did nothing, our entire family at some point would develop sensitivity to wheat or autoimmune disease in some form due to the toxic manner in which it is processed and the glyphosate residues that are contained in conventional wheat products.
What Are You Going to Do About Toxic Wheat?
How did you react to the news that US wheat farmers are using Roundup, not just to kill weeds, but to dry out the wheat plants to allow for an earlier, easier and bigger harvest and that such a practice causes absorption of toxic glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup and other herbicides, right into the wheat kernels themselves?
Did you feel outraged and violated as I did? How will you implement a conventional wheat-avoidance strategy going forward even if you haven’t yet developed a problem with gluten or wheat sensitivity?
What about other crops where Roundup is used as a pre-harvest desiccant such as barley, sugar cane, rice, seeds, dried beans and peas, sugar cane, sweet potatoes, and sugar beets? Will you only be buying these crops in organic form from now on to avoid this modern, man-made scourge?
UPDATE: The Soil Association in July 2015 called for an immediate ban on the use of glyphosate for wheat ripening and desiccation purposes. The nonprofit reports that glyphosate residues are widely found in nonorganic wheat samples and the use of the herbicide on wheat crops has increased 400% in the past two decades.
Dr. Robin Mesnage of the Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics at Kings College in London, revealed new data analysis showing Roundup, the most common brand of Glyphosate based herbicides, is 1,000 times more toxic than genotoxic glyphosate alone due to the inclusion of other toxic chemicals in its mix.
Peter Melchett, Soil Association policy director said; “If Glyphosate ends up in bread it’s impossible for people to avoid it unless they are eating organic. On the other hand, farmers could easily choose not to use Glyphosate as a spray on wheat crops – just before they are harvested. This is why the Soil Association is calling for the immediate ending of the use of Glyphosate sprays on wheat destined for use in bread.”
References
Glyphosate now commonly found in human urine
Study: Glyphosate, Celiac and Gluten Intolerance
The Glyphosate, Celiac Disease Connection
Pre-harvest Application of Glyphosate to Wheat
Glyphosate’s Suppression of Cytochrome P450 Enzymes and Amino Acid Biosynthesis by the Gut Microbiome: Pathways to Modern Diseases
Yield and quality of wheat seeds as a function of desiccation stages and herbicides
Wheat farmer weighs in on the use of Roundup as a wheat desiccant
More Information
Roundup: Quick Death for Weeds, Slow and Painful Death for You
Hybrid Wheat is Not the Same as GMO Wheat
The Dutch Ban Roundup, France and Brazil to Follow
How to Mix and Use Gluten Free Flour
Can Celiacs Eat Sourdough Bread?
The Dirty Little Secret About Gluten-Free
JC
Sarah, then what is picloram aka agent orange~a couple years ago I learned they were allowed to use picloram to ripen the wheat. Thus started my search. A friend at the farmer’s market informed me the laws changed allowing its use even along the roadside for killing plants and trees, which is why you see them dead along the road…which looks hideous. I’d rather see the weeds~! Anyway, I did as much research as time allowed by reading quite a bit of the hearing regarding agent orange and its affects on our service men during Vietnam. I did contact Wheat Montana and inquired if they used a ripening agent and at the time they said they did not use it and allowed it to ripen naturally. Food for thot here.
Picloram
Chemical Compound
Picloram is a systemic herbicide used for general woody plant control. It also controls a wide range of broad-leaved weeds, but most grasses are resistant. A chlorinated derivative of picolinic acid, picloram is in the pyridine family of herbicides. Wikipedia
Rod
Picloram is a chemical name for Tordon 22k. The original formula in Tordon pellets was changed to eliminate the chlorinated end of it. It would not break down in the soil effectively. Agent organs was more closely relate to 24-D. Again Wikipedia gets it wrong.
MelT
Almost all Wheat in US is GMO and is infectious in the infections you already have. In fact they are already growing in your skin, guts, and brains in recombinations of fungal/prion synergy of pathological proteins that recombine with whatever they want to survive.
They have been told repeatedly, they have been shown, and they have been told NO ONE is buying their GMO grains. Soo that means the one’s they want to get rid of the most have to eat it!!!
http://www.lymeneteurope.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=5147&start=10
Our results indicate that the amyloidogenic proteins,
+++including those contained in foods and cosmetics,+++
contribute to Aβ aggregation by binding to Aβ, suggesting their possible roles in the propagation of Aβ amyloidosis.
The chemical’s are just the icing on the Cake knowing over 95% of the pops is already infected with the real cause of AIDS and sick infected cells do not process toxins well at all.
Todd
As of 2013, no GM wheat is grown commercially, but many field tests have been conducted.
Sarah Pope
Wheat is *not* GMO except for test fields at the present time. Just because a crop is not GMO, however, doesn’t mean Roundup isn’t used. There are plenty of nonGMO crops where Roundup is used, wheat being the most prominent.
LP
In the first graph you use from the USDA it doesn’t say anything about the use of round-up? It just says the use of herbicides. Also in the second table you used, it appears that the use of glyphosate (which is used in some other herbicides at a much lower dose as a secondary ingredient) is on the decline as of 2010. If you could, could you update your article with more up to date information and not a chart or table showing people what was going on four years ago?
Sarah TheHealthyHomeEconomist
Given the parabolic rise in the curve showing glyphosate used on the US wheat crop, I would say it would be worse today than it was in 2010! As more data becomes available, I will post.
Charla
This publication from Monsanto tells on page 6 how to use Roundup just before harvest to kill all the wheat plants so they all die at the same time ad harvest can be more successful. So if MONSANTO tells how this is done, I believe farmers are using this procedure. http://roundup.ca/_uploads/documents/MON-Preharvest%20Staging%20Guide.pdf
Rolande
Damn! It must be in Canada too!
Rod
No wheat in the US is a GMO
Charla
Rod, the point is that wheat is NOT a GMO crop. Otherwise spraying the wheat crop with Roundup specifically to kill the plants at the same time would not work.
Leah
Yep, as soon as I heard that they dried down wheat and legumes with round up, I said to myself, and anyone who would listen, it’s not the gluten, it’s the glyphosate! Also, people don’t really read what you write do they, Sarah? I can’t believe the number of people who replied with, wheat is not GMO in the United States… And for those people who don’t believe they dry down wheat and legumes with Roundup, get a clue. This is common knowledge if you’ve done any research at all on the subject.
Az farmer
Made bread using home grown wheat with no roundup and no pesticides and my gluten free friend ate it and spent all day om toilet. Roundup theory wrong,
Sarah TheHealthyHomeEconomist
You missed the entire point of the article!
Az farmer
I must have. I think your question is a valid one as I have also wondered why the prevalence of wheat related problems. You conclusion is wrong however. How bout This point. I know of no farmer that sprays round up over wheat. It does not happen on a commercial scale. You cited a uk study. I would encourage anyone to call a local farmer and ask for yourself. Plenty of farmers around. I farm thousands of acres and have friends and family throughout Arizona and Mississippi totaling hundreds of thousands of acres of wheat and no roundup is applied.
Sarah TheHealthyHomeEconomist
You obviously did not read the article. The study of increasing glyphosate application to wheat was from USDA data.
nofarmnofood
Sarah, I am curious if your USDA data actually specified the time during which this RoundUp was applied. I am an agronomist (former Extension Agent) and while certainly some people use desiccants, it is usually only if they absolutely have to. I would specifically wonder if the increase in RoundUp use was more a result of pre-emergence application on wheat fields, to kill weeds in a field where wheat is emerging/about to be planted.
Farmers, like most of us, try to be as frugal as possible in their practices and would love to avoid a spray if they can. The alternative would be needing to dry it (many of them don’t have/can’t afford drying equipment, depending on the amt. of acreage they have), or deal with losses due to fungal development. While I’m not saying that the practice of desiccation is good- it’s clear that we don’t fully know the health impacts and we need lots more research to investigate this- I don’t think it’s helpful to demonize farmers as spray-crazy people-killers who worship Monsanto. Many farmers distrust Monsanto and agribusiness just as much as anyone else. Ultimately, we all need to work TOGETHER -farmers and city folk, “naturals” and “nozzelheads”- to address these issues- and avoid letting mindsets divide us all.
JC
just a curious bit of into from James Townsend. He did a youtube video on 18th Century Cooking and his guest found info from the Crimean war regarding wheat..you might find this fascinating.
Yes, its about making ash cakes..listen to the point he makes on the wheat.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lIdsJJ1w19s
watchmom3
Az…we are farmers/ranchers also..and I think you need to tone down your insistence that you have all knowledge on all things farm/ranch. Everyone has their own experience, so just because yours doesn’t match, doesn’t mean there is no truth to another’s perspective/opinion. Why are people so closed minded? We used to be a nation of free thinkers!
amy
Local farmer, here. No, we don’t spray our wheat with round-up. It might make it die evenly, not sure? However, it won’t produce more seeds. The number of seeds is determined long before it dies. Think about it, that’s like saying that if you put a flower under distress it will produce more blossoms? No, quite the opposite.
dave
Umm… yeah, agree with Sarah. You have missed the point entirely.
Greg-
Home grown doesn’t address the issue that your wheat may also be hybrid wheat. Even organically grown hybrid wheat is suspect for gluten problems. It wouldn’t be the organic’s or the way the wheat is grown, in this case, hybrid wheat has changed the starches, proteins and ultimately the gluten.
Try ancient wheat such as Kamut, Spelt or Einkorn and see if your friend fares any better. Many of our customers use these ancient grains because they can consume them with no issues, but they cannot consume hybrid red/white wheat/flour.
Br.Bill
Sad story, but a singular event is not data, and it does not prove or disprove anything.
Matt
@Ranj. How are any of the assertions she made in the article incorrect. Please respond… A quick rewind of things presented in the article. Glyphosate is used as a crop desiccant, the evidence for this practice is overwhelming. She provides charts, graphs and tables, some are from the USDA. Glyphosate translocates through the crop/plant. The residue persists and becomes part of the plant. The crops become available in the marketplace. Consumer buys these crops at the grocery store and eats them. Consumer gets sick, eventually. MIT study is done by Dr. Senef and her partner linking glyphosate to human health problems. Evidence emerges that glyphosate is turning up in human urine and breast milk. People are getting sick with all sorts of illnesses that are food related. What is wrong with this picture. It does not take a PhD to figure this out. Please school us on what is going on here.